A conversation with Vyatta CEO Kelly Herrell

Vyatta believes that networking hardware is old school and that its Layer-3 virtual networking stack can do it all while being cheaper and greener than traditional gear. In my ongoing series with industry CEOs, I talked with Vyatta CEO Kelly Herrell for his viewpoint on where his company fits into the market today.

Where is the market when it comes to network virtualization technology and where do you still see growth?

Kelly HerrellAs enterprises consolidate data centers and migrate applications to the cloud, they are finding that they are losing their ability to connect and protect those apps in the same manner they could in a physical, cabled infrastructure. This has produced an immediate requirement for a new way to deploy key network functionality like routing, firewall, VPN, and IPS within the virtualized architectures of enterprise and service provider clouds.

Vyatta delivers all of this functionality within a single network OS, which we deliver as a virtual machine. This enables Vyatta customers to deliver the same network topologies they had before virtualization – network topologies that are absolute requirements for their business. We saw the market for network virtualization emerge in 2009, ignite in 2010 and is now exploding.  It’s easily tripling or quadrupling every year now. (BACKGROUND: Vyatta readies for virtual machine explosion)

Who do you see as your biggest competitor and why?

Vyatta has always been focused on delivering a platform-independent software network operating system that covers routing, security and threat protection.  From the perspective of a software and virtual machine business model we see virtually (pun intended) no competition. Our main competitor is legacy hardware-based products.  But trying to use proprietary hardware routers in a virtualized data center or cloud is extraordinarily sub optimal – it’s an approach that is entirely inflexible and loaded with CapEx, which is the exact opposite of what virtualization and cloud architectures are supposed to offer.

Cisco and Juniper have been slow to offer virtual machines and are both in the process of retooling basic virtual firewall products added through acquisitions.  But even then that will be a far cry from what customers need. (BACKGROUND: Vyatta pits new appliances against Cisco ISR.)

Where do you see your product expanding to next and what new options will you add to the current product?

Recent surveys show up to 60% of virtual data centers rely on commercial use of more than one hypervisor. Understanding that, Vyatta plans to be ubiquitous across all hypervisors and cloud management environments. VMware use cases are there naturally, and Vyatta has extraordinary levels of interest from the Xen and KVM communities. Creating optimized virtual machines for these hypervisors, as well as cloud provider container images, is where we’ll continue.

We are also continually partnering to engage with other top tier vendors solving unique problems in the cloud and virtual data center worlds. We’ve recently joined the Open Virtualization Alliance where of the 70 member organizations Vyatta is No. 4 in terms of Web interest behind only IBM, HP and Red Hat. Citrix is an investor in Vyatta and a strong go-to-market partner. At the cloud management layer, Vyatta is already integrated into Cloud.com and Yunteq, and we have several other partner integrations in the works. (BACKGROUND: The network is built in)

I know many readers would like to hear where your products compete with other vendors. So if you could, by product, please tell us which vendor product it competes against and why you think yours are a better value.

Vyatta is the next-gen alternative to proprietary router/VPN/firewall devices that range in price from $1,000 – $100,000.  In the old world those products might include the Cisco ISR and ASA line of devices. What makes Vyatta the next-gen alternative is our platform-neutral nature – we deliver the same functionality as software running on any x86 server and all virtualization platforms. Because it runs on existing virtualized servers, a customer’s CapEx is slashed 90% by shifting to Vyatta.  Because it’s a virtual machine it can be provisioned, scaled, moved or de-provisioned with the click of a button. This flexibility matches the “On Demand” nature of cloud data centers.  In fact, software-based networking is the only way that “On Demand” can be delivered without massive over-provisioning of infrastructure.

Vyatta models
Vyatta models. Source: Vyatta. Click to enlarge image.

Do you see consolidation in the market place or more companies starting up in this space?

I see both dynamics. The market is growing so fast it will naturally attract new competitors.  And as I write this, Citrix announced its acquisition of Cloud.com which is evidence of “stack consolidation” happening around us. So in the face of these dynamics, the extraordinary thing about Vyatta at this particular time in history is that we have a global software footprint delivered by years of our free download strategy and massive user community.  Vyatta is in test & dev in data centers around the world.

Let’s talk about the cloud, what is Vyatta doing in the cloud now?

Vyatta is now powering large cloud networks around the world.  If a cloud is delivering enterprise-class functionality with an on-demand model, they’re likely using Vyatta to handle a large part of the necessary networking functionality.  Enterprises must necessarily employ the same networking benefits they had before, but within a cloud IT architecture. Vyatta is the easiest and most flexible way to achieve that.

How are you helping large cloud providers manage their service by using your product?

Vyatta talks about “On Demand Networking.” One of our large customers, Carpathia Hosting, offers cloud services under an “On Demand” brand.  By including Vyatta virtual machines in their customer deployment processes, our cloud customers get the benefit of deploying their network services as effortlessly as they deploy their virtualized servers and storage.  As far as they are concerned the network is an application that can be provisioned and billed the same as any other they are providing. Being able to present their customers a completely isolated and secure cloud environment that meets compliance standards like PCI and HIPAA provides them with a more complete product offering and a larger addressable customer base.

Let’s talk green. Many companies talk about it but they really don’t do it. Can you tell us what Vyatta is doing to be environmentally friendly and how customer can save money in this way?

Green benefits naturally accrue to well-designed virtualized and cloud infrastructures. Vyatta is a part of that. For every Vyatta VM deployed, the customer eliminates the majority of space, power and heat produced by a physical networking device.  A 2U traditional router has its own power draw and heat production, whereas a Vyatta VM can take as little as 1/5th of an x86 1U – that’s a massive reduction in space and power. Multiply that by hundreds or thousands of units in a data center and the green benefits are very significant.

Right now we are at 10gbps, moving to 40gbps and beyond. Where do you see Vyatta moving to and how fast?

Two clarifications:  First, it’s critical to separate Layer 2 switching from Layer 3+ routing and security.  The speeds you mention are the latest speed limits on switching; production environments for enterprise routing and security are still largely in the 1-10Gbps arena. Second, the speed requirements of a network VM are paced by the throughput requirements between application VMs, which are relatively modest.  It’s one thing to ask how fast packets travel across the data center floor; it’s a completely different thing to ask how fast they need to go into and out of a specific VM.

That said, Vyatta today has production customers running 10GbE networks on single-socket x86 servers. Very soon those same servers will deliver staggering throughput and port density. Intel is serious about owning a large percentage of the new network workload.  Vyatta has improved 100X in throughput in the last four years via Intel, and the pace of advancement isn’t slowing anytime soon.

What is the one question when meeting with potential customers that you get the most and why?

It’s changed over the past year. Before virtualization the question was, “Can low-cost x86 servers really handle packet processing?”  But after interest in virtualized networking took off, that hardware question has totally disappeared.  Now our most common question is, “What are the best practices among Vyatta customers?”

Many vendors I talk to bring up customer purchasing terms, many have moved from 15-30 days to 60-90 days. Do you think this is getting out of hand or is the power in the customer hands?

Vyatta is a software company, so our customer engagement model is very, very different from the legacy hardware days.  For example, we offer our cloud providers a Service Provider Licensing Agreement that allows them to pay based on usage, so their networking costs are in line with their customer usage.

Do you see Vyatta doubling in sales within five years?

We’re more than doubling sales this year alone; it’s accelerating past that.  We’re dealing with a multi-billion-dollar market going through a phenomenal technology disruption.

What is the biggest misconception about Vyatta that people believe or hear?

The one we get the most is that people believe we’re already a huge company. This comes from the amazing Vyatta community – a quarter of a million registered members around the world and growing rapidly. So many people are talking about Vyatta, becoming certified on Vyatta, using Vyatta in their test/dev environments, and rolling Vyatta out in production networks…  it’s unreal.  User groups are forming around the world.  We’re casting a shadow ten times larger than we are tall.

It has been a while since we have seen some head-to-head testing against your competitors, when will we see more?

We don’t have any scheduled!  Back in 2008 when people still questioned whether x86 servers had the chops to do packet processing, we had Tolly do some head-to-head testing against Cisco to prove that we were right.  But Intel’s advancements have crushed that now.  Today, an $800 Intel server with Vyatta on it can easily displace a $20,000 Cisco box.  That part of the game is largely over, so we don’t bother any more.

If you could partner with one company right now to expand your product line or sales who would it be and why?

IBM is a logical choice given their focus on cloud and need to get off of Cisco gear now that they compete in the server space with them.  But expect to see more of the virtualized software vendors on our partner list – the kinds of companies that are winning the next-gen IT architectures.

iPad, iPhone or Android?

The white cables in my office give me away as an iGuy.  The upside is all of the integration between the iThings; the downside is having to wrestle them out of the hands of my 8-year-old son – only to find he’s discovered more functionality than I probably use!

What kind of songs are on your MP3 player? 

My iTunes looks like a musical meatloaf – a little bit of everything.  Pearl Jam, Jack White and Soundgarden share space with Diana Krall and Debussy.  I need music that matches my moods.

Being an executive like myself you have to have a release. Mine is golf or my handheld satellite radio. What is yours?

I’m a ski nut, but that’s too seasonal.  As it turns out, my favorite all-season activity is cooking.  We’re a cooking family and the menu ranges widely.  But there’s nothing quite like hanging around with family and friends while some Memphis ribs are smoking away for hours…

Fly, drive or train; which would you take the most if you had the chance?

Trains are incredibly underrated.  I take them every chance I get.  You can see the real world as it whizzes by.  Life’s too full of tactical distractions to drive, and too many cushions from reality to fly ;-)

A conversation with Jayshree Ullal CEO, Arista Networks

I decided to reach out to a few CEOs beginning with Jayshree Ullal, CEO of Arista Networks. I appreciate that she took the time to answer my questions. I hope it provides some perspective on the market, company and the CEO herself.

Jayshree UllalI would be remiss if I did not first bring up the Cisco press release in which it positioned itself as the best choice for the financial trading industry, an area where Arista has made inroads. This created a heated discussion on my blog. What are your thoughts on the press release?

It is uncharacteristic for Cisco to be so targeted and competitive. I view it as validation of Arista’s best of breed product and a compliment to us. Cisco is very good at reacting and has a strong dominance in classic enterprise switching. However, Cisco is having to deal with being behind in several industry disruptions. Customer buying behaviors are disruption because of cloud computing, their business and gross margin model is a disruption and there is also a technology disruption because of modern silicon and software.

What is the state of networking OS evolution and software-defined networking and Arista’s role in it?
Isn’t it strange that hardware changes every 1-2 years but the core network operating system has not seen major changes in  decades? The majority of the Internet is still powered with Cisco IOS which is 20+ years old. While tweaks or improvements have been made on modularity with Juniper’s JunOS or the introduction of a Linux based OS with Cisco NXOS – there really has not been a modern resilient open networking OS purpose built for cloud and data center environments. This is where Arista’s Extensible Operating System – EOS is so powerful.

Built from the ground up based on an open Linux kernel, the fundamental advantage of EOS is enforcing a state agnostic system database (SysDB) suitable for real time operations. In EOS, the switch recovers seamlessly (as opposed to a restart or replay) from any condition causing process restart. Arista EOS is also controller friendly and can easily adapt to evolving specifications such asOpenflow. Arista developed an advanced operating system that would take 5+ years and thousands of man hours to recreate. This is what drew me to the company and is the key foundation.

What are your thoughts on these independent tests? It is an “understanding” that if you pay for the test you will always win. Do you think that an independent testing center should be used by all vendors? Not paid for by vendors but by others like the customers?

Tests based on standard RFCs do not often simulate real world operating conditions but are a good baseline. Some organizations, especially those tied to universities such as E-ANTC and UNH, have a long history and a good reputation. Also, we welcome industry driven multivendor independent testing such as those conducted by NetworkWorld where no vendor has tried to skew or pay for the tests.  Pay-for-play tests are often contrived by a single vendor, do not represent real world and are ultimately discredited by any savvy customer, who will look to do their own independent analysis. Clearly I am not a big fan or advocate of pay-for-play tests.

There’s been a lot written by other bloggers that your product saves money over Cisco. Can you tell us in detail how your product saves customers money over other products?

The comparison in question was between Cisco’s recommended ‘best practice’ design of using the Nexus 7000 in the aggregation, the Nexus 5000 in the access, and the Nexus 1000v for the vSwitch. This was contrasted with the Arista 7500 in the aggregation and 7100 Series in the access and used Arista’s VM Tracer to achieve physical-to-virtual integration. The cost savings came from several sources
1) Network hardware pricing
2) Network Interface Cards
3) Avoiding vendor specific SFP cables for host interconnect
4) Avoiding the required Enterprise Plus version of ESX needed for the Cisco 1000v
5) Power costs based on DOE average pricing in the US

Since this was published over a year ago pricing has changed on some components, but the overall cost savings that can still be realized by using Arista 7000 family is still significant and marked.

Let’s talk about EOS Central, what is it and how do you think it will change the way customers look at your products and the cloud?

I am personally excited about EOS Central, as this was inspired by application networking vendors such as F5 who have taken a more application and vertical solution focus to networking than plain connectivity or models where all features must come from the vendor. It is also very appealing to our technical and engineering community of customers who want to harness the power of Arista EOS more. EOS Central, launched in May 2011, offers development tools to bridge the gap that exists today, actively sharing EOS extensions, code samples, collaborative forums and early examples of use-cases in key markets like Big Data, Virtualization, and latency analysis.

In what ways does your products compete with other vendors? So if you could, by product, tell us which vendor/product they compete against and why you think yours are a better value.

On one hand I could say we have no competitors because we have taken such a unique vertical approach to modern cloud networking and on the other hand you could say everybody who builds a 10GbE switch is our competitor!  Both statements are true. What is clear is we are not building legacy oversubscribed networks and are really focused on the intersection of dense cloud computing, storage and networks. This problem has not been tackled properly by classic networking companies. Infiniband as a technology that tried to do so but remains niche in high-end clusters. High performance Ethernet is the mainstream multi-billion dollar market opportunity and is supporting the next generation of data centers.

Many have wondered if you will make a push into telco carrier sales to compete against Juniper, Cisco, Alcatel and others?

We are not a fit in traditional telco applications using TDM/Optical with IP as an overlay but are a natural application for new video/media and high performance hosting applications and cloud providers. Several high profile companies including the world’s largest SaaS provider, cloud providers, hosting and service providers are using Arista for such applications. They have been conducting trials for many months and are seeing significant power, footprint, scale and operational advantages.

What new verticals, segments do you see Arista moving into within the next few years?

Arista’s strongest vertical to date has been financial services [particularly High Frequency Trading firms] and we continue the value the strong partnership we have here with 150+ customers in this space. We have been pleasantly surprised with the rapid acceptance of our solution in just two years. We are now making inroads in several other verticals with that same application focus including cloud providers, Web 2.0 companies, media and health/education research institutions. These are natural expansions for us.

If you had to pick one vendor who is your biggest competition and why?

I have a healthy respect for Cisco, both as my former long-time employer and their dominance in the enterprise switching market. Despite their current product deficiencies and challenges, they are a formidable competitor with long-term relationships, an army of CCIEs in their installed base, and solid customer loyalty.

Recently I wrote on my blog from Interop Las Vegas about HP Labs and an optical backplanefor switching equipment. Do you think this will be the next big thing as I do, or do you see something different coming? Something that will be a game changer?

It is great to see big companies like HP innovating and certainly optical backplanes are becoming more production worthy and coming out of the research phase. That said I think we can still push the serial copper backplane technology to greater limits and achieve terabits of backplane capacity as well. I don’t see it as a game changer but as a good option in ultra high speed applications beyond 100Gb.

Let’s talk green, many companies talk about it but they really don’t do it. Can you tell us Arista is going in the green space and how customer can save money with your products?

While the power savings make an impact on the operating costs of the equipment, the main benefit most customers realize is on getting more computational capacity out of a given facility with a fixed power envelope. For instance, in a 3MW data center there is a maximum amount of compute capacity that can be deployed before you run out of power, and the costs for the facility at max power are relatively fixed.

Everything you can do to reduce the power draw of the network and optimize airflow efficiencies increases the number of servers that can be deployed.  As an example: A 3MW Data Center can support 5000 600w servers in a perfect world, this would take 125 cabinets and we can assume that in a legacy enterprise data center design this would require 250 ToR switches and then an aggregation tier.  Sticking with current design practices we will use 3:1 oversubscription from the host ports to the uplink ports on the ToR switch (48 host ports, 16 uplink ports) and deploy a wirespeed routed backbone.

Connecting 5000 10GbE dual homed servers with Arista will take 250 7050s and 12 Arista 7500s.  The power draw of the network will be 75.6kw which will cause a reduction of 126 servers, or about 3 racks and is 2.5% of the total power available.

Max compute density with Arista is 4874 servers.

Connecting 5000 10GbE dual-homed servers with Cisco (using their best practice design guide which recommends the Cisco 5500 with FCoE and the Nexus 7000) will take 278 Nexus 5548s (each delivering 36 hosts per cabinet with 12 ports of uplink) and 26 Nexus 7018s (each delivering wirespeed 128 10GbE ports, although since this uses side-to-side airflow it takes 2 cabinets for each switch).  This network is already oversubscribed and not wirespeed at the backbone layer and actually needs a second stage of 13 Nexus 7018s to interconnect the first stage.

Nexus 5548 = 390W
278 Nexus 5548 = 108kW

Nexus 7018 with 16×32 port 10GbE M1 Modules (needed for L3 routing) = 11kW
39 Nexus 7018s = 435kW

Total Cisco power draw for 5000 ports – 525kW, or about 17% of the overall power available and causes a reduction in server capacity of 875 servers.

Max compute density with Cisco is 4125 Servers.

To put a rational dollar figure on this if we assumed this was a public cloud deployment where every IT asset is monetized and assumed $50/VM at 20VMs per server, the monthly revenue on the two data centers is as follows:

Arista Data Center: $4.874M/Month
Cisco Data Center: $4.125M/Month

The Arista design saves enough power to add $8.98 million dollars per year to the bottom line of a cloud computing site.

Right now we are at 10gbps, moving to 40gbps and beyond. Where do you see Arista moving to and how fast? Could we see 100gbps at the switch level by 2012?

I am very bullish about 10Gbe as a mainstream transition in the data center in 2012-2014.  The 1GbE transition took 5 years and happened from 2000-2005. 10GbE has primarily been an uplink and core technology but has been moving to key horizontals such as dense storage, high end computing and virtualization. These high performance transactions demand high performance and low latency. With the advent if new multicore CPUs from Intel and AMD, I expect the integration of 10GbE and 10GBASE-T  into the server mainboard to realistically happen in 2012 onwards.  This will create a natural pull to “spine” aggregation switching of 40Gbe and 100Gbe thereafter.

Do you see Arista adding a NAC to its product line to help with security?

NAC has had mixed reception and deployment in the wiring closet and almost a non-starter in data centers, where the concept of security is less tied to identity and more to the application. So we try to work with industry-leading security vendors to build EOS extensions and innovative firewall options with them.

Additionally, given the push towards virtualization by natively integrating with the virtual machine platform we are able to understand what is actually connected and apply appropriate policy and segmentation/forwarding characteristics by authoritatively interconnecting with the virtualization platform.

What is the one question when meeting with potential customer that you get the most and why?

Ah, good question! The most common question since we are a young and fast growth company, I get asked is  ”What is your exit strategy? Are you going to be bought?” They fear that we will be purchased by an unfriendly company. Our customers and well-wishers want us and view us as a credible viable alternative solution and want us to be independent. This is our goal as well.

Many vendors I talk to bring up customer purchasing terms, many have moved from 15-30 days to 60-90 days. Do you think this is getting out of hand or is the power in the customer hands?

I haven’t seen a big change here quite honestly. Maybe Arista purchases need to get bigger to see that!

Ipad, iphone or android?

I am a slow adopter of consumer technology …iPhone and contemplating iPad sometime in the future.

 What kinds of songs are on your mp3 player?

Mixture of Bollywood songs, to Abba, Michael Jackson and classical music.

Being an executive, I know I have to have regular stress release. Mine is golf or my handheld satellite radio. What is yours?

Doggie walks, karaoke music, a good book, Big Bang Theory TV show, chocolate and therefore exercise combo!

Fly, drive or train; which would you take the most if you had the chance. Allow Doug [Gourlay] to fly you everywhere?

Given the time, I love train rides, and have some childhood nostalgia about that. As for Doug flying me everywhere, he has a full time job and I would need more insurance coverage! Just kidding of course ..

The Top Ten Reasons why companies should use a source for Telco Voice and Data Sales

This is a very good article on why every company should have an independent agent look into voice and data carrier costs.

Pluto Networks provides unbiased carrier voice and data sales to customer worldwide.

Ever increasingly, businesses are choosing to get their telecom services fromindependent agents instead of direct carrier account manager. We look at the top10 reasons why we see this shift occurring in the marketplace today.
1. Mergers and AcquisitionsSales is already known as a high turnover profession, but the recent rash of mergers andacquisitions in telecom make it highly unlikely the representative who signed you to yourterm agreement will still be there to assist you within a year. After making it past the phaseof bankruptcies following deregulation, the next phase is mergers and acquisitions. In thepast couple of years, a few of the major mergers include Level3/Broadwing (Focal),XO/Allegiance, ATT/SBC/Bell South, MCI/Verizon, Paetec/US Lec, and TimeWarner/Xspedius among many others. By using an Independent Telecom Agent, you can besure that regardless of continued merger activity or bankruptcies, your IndependentTelecom Agent will continue to have the same contact phone number and email address.He/She will not be laid off or fired, and will continue to supply you all of the options youneed.
2. Single Point of ContactRegardless of whether your Independent Telecom Agent recommends a single carriersolution or a multi-carrier solution, you still have a single point of contact to deal with theperson who knows your account best. During the pricing and evaluation process for a newcarrier, it is typical to get at least 3 bids and have at least two appointments with at leastthree carriers. The number of appointments you have to schedule could easily reach up to adozen before an educated decision is made on your company’s communications. If you usea qualified Independent Telecom Agent, you can spend one appointment determining thebest course of action, and just one more evaluating the best options available in yourmarket. Having a single point of contact is a huge time saver!
3. Person who understands your company, how you make decisions, and why.Your Independent Telecom Agent acts as an assistant buyer once he/she understands yourbusiness needs and preferences. He/she gets to know your organization, your goals andlong range needs, and how you make decisions and why. Why would you want to repeatthat process every couple of years?
4. You get to hear the truth!Perhaps this should be ranked #1! When you use an experienced Independent TelecomAgent, you tap into a wealth of knowledge and experience of someone who has been in thefield for many years-and most likely with multiple carriers. Your agent will typically haveexperience dealing with multiple carriers in your market, and can tell you howthey really perform. Not the rosy picture they all want to paint for you. Who has the mostreliable network? Who has billing problems? Who is going bankrupt? Who can make thedesired install date? When using an Independent agent, you don’t have to listen to “TheCompany Story” for each carrier, as they always tend to dress up their deficiencies. You getto hear the truth.

5. Unbiased opinion of multiple carriers and their product linesBased on where your business is heading, whether that be expanding, streamlining, orcontracting, your Independent Telecom Agent can put you in the right situation. Just likebuying an inexpensive phone system that can’t grow with you, and can create the need fora forklift upgrade sooner than expected, getting stuck with a carrier that can’t meet yourfuture expectations can be crippling to your operation. Since most carriers have gone toterm agreements in the T-1 age of communications, it’s key to get set up with a carrier thatcan move with your needs. Do they have MPLS? Do they do SIP trunking? Can they offer anIP-VPN solution for your remote sites? Your Independent Telecom Agent knows the carriers’products and limitations, and can put you in the right solution for your company.
6. Agents are invested in your success long termThis is an incredibly important concept to understand when choosing to use an IndependentTelecom Agent! When you work with a direct sales representative for a telecom company,one that may be here and gone tomorrow (rep or company), they are paid only to bring inthe sale. As we all know in the world of corporate sales, comp plans drive behavior, andsales reps are specifically told, “If the customer has a problem, send them to the Help Desk.Do not get involved. You are paid ONLY to bring in new business.” There is absolutely nomotivation, despite the direct representative’s best intentions, for them to ever speak toyou again after you sign the dotted line. It’s sad but true. On the flip side, becauseIndependent Telecom Agents are commission only and residual based, earning a smallpercentage of the monthly bill, it takes them, in many cases, up to 24 months to get paidwhat the direct representative will get paid in month number one after the sale. The entiremotivation for someone even becoming an Independent Telecom Agent is to build a book ofbusiness of happy customers that don’t have to find someone new every couple of years todeal with. This relationship only makes sense for the agent if you stay with them for over 24months, so they have EVERY motivation to assist you in solving any service issues that youmay ever have. A good Independent Telecom Agent isn’t just another business associate;they become part of your team.

7. They don’t have a quota to makeOne of the biggest issues I have with local RBOC/ILEC, is that if you call in to the call centerto order new service, you will only be told about what THEY want to sell you. NOT what isbest for you. Everyone LOVES to sell bundles in telecom, but let me ask you this. Why doyou need Centrex calling features or voice mail on your alarm or elevator lines? Do youneed call transfer or remote access to call forwarding on every line in your hunt group andon your fax lines? Do you have mysterious items in the back of your bill for web hosting orother items you are afraid to disconnect in case you actually use it? When I call theILEC/RBOC directly from the agent channel, I get offered different packages, and moreattractive packages, than I get over the phone through the call center. It is verycommon for Independent Telecom Agents to uncover up to 10-20% of pure fluff on your billduring the auditing process. Why does this happen? Simple. The direct representatives youbuy from have a quota to make and will often sell you what is good for them, not what isgood for you. They are directed to sell what is profitable for the carrier they work for, andare paid accordingly based on their ability to do so. Top Independent Telecom Agents,almost without exception; do not carry quotas with any carriers. Because they do not carryquotas, you will not find them pushing you towards a solution that doesn’t feel quite rightjust to meet their numbers. Be frank and ask your Independent Telecom Agent if they carry quotas with the carriers proposed. If they do carry a quota, be sure to ask enough questionsabout the solution they are suggesting to make sure it is right for you.
8. Extra Incentives and PromotionsThe Telecom Industry is moving increasingly towards the Independent Agent Channel. Infact, last year, a local ATT/SBC agent manager said the Agent channel gained morebusiness through their agent Winback program than they did their direct Winback program.Even they were shocked! There are several reasons for this. Independent Telecom Agentsare typically more knowledgeable, better trained, set proper expectations with the clients,their clients tend to remain clients longer (since they were sold the right program), and it ismore cost effective for the carriers to deal with Agents. They do not pay base salaries orbenefits, in addition to commissions. Strangely enough, where I have seen this benefit thecustomer most, is in the form of special incentives and promotions offered only through theAgent Channel. It is not uncommon for agents to compete head to head with a directrepresentative for one of the carriers they are presenting. It is also not uncommon for theagent channel to have promotions or incentives that the direct representative has not beengiven for the customer, and the agent will typically win the customer because of that fact. Ifthe direct representatives have promotions available, they are often compensated extra ifthey do not use them. Independent Telecom Agents will pull out any available promotionsavailable in an effort to gain your business for the long haul, as they are typically notincented or penalized for use of promotions.

9. Same PricingThe exact same standard pricing is used in the Agent Channel and the direct channel. Inspite of all of the additional knowledge you can tap into with Independent Agents, you canbe sure you are not charged any extra for it. For large projects, special pricing is availableto both Agent and direct channels at the same amounts. It’s an incredible model that helpsthe customer and agent win, and insures all clients are treated equally.

10. They understand Next Generation TechnologyIndependent Telecom Agents will typically be better versed in MPLS, IP-VPN, VOIP, hostedsolutions, call center applications, and SIP technologies since they need to understandmultiple carriers’ offerings and have attended their trainings. Direct representatives willoften know a few tweaks to their individual limited product line a little better than agentsthat do not exclusively sell their product, but they will not have the overall understanding ofall that is coming with new technology. No carrier can be the master of all technologies andmaster of all niches. It’s a business impossibility. So it follows that it is nearly impossible fora direct representative to have the same breadth and width of exposure to the applicationsyou are facing decisions on. Business is fiercely competitive, and implementation of some ofthe new technologies correctly can literally save larger companies hundreds of thousands ofdollars. That may be the exact edge your company needs to gain the competitive advantagein your marketplace for security, marketing, recruiting, or even retention. Likewise,implementing a bleeding edge technology that is not ready for prime time may cost you thesame. Using an experienced Independent Telecom Agent who is looking out for your bestinterests may make all the difference.

 

 

Larry Chaffin and Pluto Networks receive 2010 Nominations by Innovation Awards

Larry Chaffin the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of Pluto Networks has been nominated for Executive of the Year by the 2010 Innovation Awards. This is Larry Chaffin’s fourth nomination in five years.

Pluto Networks and its Pluto One Care Service for Riverbed Technology Products, received a nomination for Outstanding Service of the Year for the second straight year. The winners will be chosen in February 2011.

Larry Chaffin said “ it is once again a great honor to be nominated by our customers for these awards. I am very proud of our Pluto Once Care Service and the nomination, it is truly a great service we give to our customers.”

Pluto Networks provides free thirty day evaluations of Riverbed Steelheads, Mobile and RSP product to customers around the world.

“Providing customer a solid ROI when they purchase any product and specifically Riverbed is what we believe. Our personal service, one person one voice philosophy is what our customers rave about over other resellers” said Larry Chaffin.”We understand that business needs drive IT spending better than any other company”.

For more information on Pluto Networks products and Service please email plutosales@pluto-networks.net .

Architectural Design Company Deploys Riverbed to Improve Employee Collaboration and Enhance Its Disaster Recovery Solution

SOURCE: Riverbed Technology

Jul 14, 2009 09:00 ET
Architectural Design Company Deploys Riverbed to Improve Employee Collaboration and Enhance Its Disaster Recovery Solution

Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners Chooses Riverbed WAN Optimization Solution to Accelerate File Download Speeds by up to 80 Percent and Protect Mission-Critical Files

SAN FRANCISCO, CA–(Marketwire – July 14, 2009) – Riverbed Technology (NASDAQ: RVBD), the IT infrastructure performance company for networks, applications and storage, today announced that global architectural design company Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners (RSHP) has deployed Riverbed® Steelhead® appliances across its organization to improve employee collaboration and enhance its now centralized disaster recovery (DR) solution.

Seamus Conway, network manager for RSHP, explains, “With Riverbed Steelhead appliances installed we saw file download speeds and remote access improve by 80 percent, enabling our employees to access and work with files and web applications over the wide area network (WAN) regardless of where they were located. In addition, we were able to enhance our now centralized DR solution between our headquarters and a third party site using our current Internet link. We have configured the DR traffic to use only 2Mbps of the total bandwidth available. Without Riverbed, our users would still be struggling to access files and we would have needed a 100Mbps bandwidth link for the DR site. We would have incurred a significant cost.”

RSHP is an award-winning international architectural practice with 140 employees worldwide and offices in London, Barcelona, Madrid and Tokyo. The company has wide experience working on a range of major international architectural projects which are co-ordinated out of its principal office in the UK and through local project offices across North America, Europe and South East Asia.

RSHP wanted to run operations around the clock, so constant employee collaboration was needed throughout its network of offices. However, due to the nature of RSHP’s work, file sizes can be very large — 50GB or greater — with links to data in other files. This resulted in employees spending long periods of time waiting for files to download. In addition, RSHP must keep the file for the lifetime of the building, so data loss is a significant concern for the company.

RSHP worked with its technology reseller, storage integrator B2net, to investigate WAN optimization solutions. “We looked at a range of WAN optimization solutions, but Riverbed was the only vendor we found to provide a truly network-based and future-proofed solution,” explains Conway. “Riverbed enabled us to enhance our centralized DR solution, which is synchronizing between 45 and 50GB of data each day. The bandwidth and throughput usage are controlled via Riverbed quality of service (QoS), which we can increase or decrease at will. Our project offices are now able to connect back to HQ from any location and access all file and network data at LAN speeds.”
Data is mirrored to a secondary site using NetApp SnapMirror via an optimized connection between the Steelhead appliances. With this model in place RSHP has a robust disaster recovery solution, ensuring the security of its mission-critical files.
RSHP is now evaluating the Riverbed Services Platform (RSP), as it is interested in providing Domain Controllers, DHCP, DNS, and print and file services to its project offices. The RSP can run up to five additional services and applications virtually on VMware in a protected partition on the Steelhead appliance. This allows local services such as print, DNS and DHCP to be deployed in branch offices without the need for servers to run the applications.

Forward Looking Statements
This press release contains forward-looking statements, including statements relating to the expected demand for Riverbed’s products and services, and statements relating to Riverbed’s ability to meet the needs of distributed organizations. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that, if they do not fully materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements include our ability to react to trends and challenges in our business and the markets in which we operate; our ability to anticipate market needs or develop new or enhanced products to meet those needs; the adoption rate of our products; our ability to establish and maintain successful relationships with our distribution partners; our ability to compete in our industry; fluctuations in demand, sales cycles and prices for our products and services; shortages or price fluctuations in our supply chain; our ability to protect our intellectual property rights; general political, economic and market conditions and events; and other risks and uncertainties described more fully in our documents filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about these and other risks that may impact Riverbed’s business are set forth in our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on April 30, 2009. All forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to us as of the date hereof, and we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements. Any future product, feature or related specification that may be referenced in this release are for information purposes only and are not commitments to deliver any technology or enhancement. Riverbed reserves the right to modify future product plans at any time.

About Riverbed
Riverbed Technology is the IT infrastructure performance company. The Riverbed family of wide area network (WAN) optimization solutions liberates businesses from common IT constraints by increasing application performance, enabling consolidation, and providing enterprise-wide network and application visibility — all while eliminating the need to increase bandwidth, storage or servers. Thousands of companies with distributed operations use Riverbed to make their IT infrastructure faster, less expensive and more responsive. Additional information about Riverbed (NASDAQ: RVBD) is available at www.riverbed.com.
Riverbed Technology, Riverbed, Steelhead, RiOS, Interceptor, Think Fast, the Riverbed logo, Mazu, Profiler, and Cascade are trademarks or registered trademarks of Riverbed Technology, Inc. All other trademarks used or mentioned herein belong to their respective owners.

Is it time to remove your remote office routers? Now you can with Riverbed and Vyatta

Is it time to remove your remote office routers? Now you can with Riverbed and Vyatta            

I hate to say this but we have been doing this for the last year for some of our customer, but now it is approved to run on the Riverbed Steelhead. Today Vyatta announced a deal with Riverbed to add the Vyatta Subscription Edition to the RSP Platform. So what you can do is now run a router, firewall and VPN on your Riverbed Steelhead and remove your current router. Sound like a good idea?

We have one customer who did this already and saved money from having to replace and upgrade old Cisco Routers. Plus they save the yearly smartnet charge that all customers hate to pay. The customer saved a good deal of money and was very happy. But I am sure people are wondering how will this affect the other vendors? It is kind of hard right now to say this is going to hurt Cisco sales, but I can tell you it is not going to help them.

This is about the time that Cisco would buy Vyatta and throw a monkey wrench into everything, but that’s what Cisco does. It buys companies who are threats. Vyatta has been a up an comer for the last year and has put out some impressive numbers in beating Cisco in head to head tests. Now then have moved into a new area with Riverbed, I think it can only get better for them.

As for Riverbed, well let’s say this was a good move. This will separate them from Cisco even more now and will put a bigger gap between them and Blue Coat, Silver Peak and Juniper. The only thing Cisco can do now is either start giving more discounts to customer for remote routers or come up with a version of their own router form a virtual machine on the WAAS. I have been wonder why they have not done this yet? They really could have dealt Riverbed a blow many years ago by doing this, but then they would have hurt hardware sales and let’s face it; the Cisco WAAS could just crash.

I think this will be a bigger story than what people think and Cisco sales of routers will slump some with those customers who have Riverbed Steelheads.

10 Key Questions that Blue Coat doesn’t want you to ask them

from Riverbed.com Blog Site

September 09, 2009

10 Key Questions that Blue Coat doesn’t want you to ask them

In any emerging market there are vendors who are technology innovators, and there are incumbent vendors in neighboring spaces who attempt to claim leadership in the emerging area through innovative marketing.  WAN optimization is no exception to this observation.  While it is easy to update web sites and data sheets with the “correct” marketing message, and to add superficial features that mimic a competitor’s product, it is far harder to build a truly innovative product that creates value for customers.

Although Blue Coat has a 10+ year history focused on web caching and web security, they have recently made aggressive claims regarding market leadership in WAN optimization.  To validate these claims of leadership, I have listed 10 key questions that are important for any Blue Coat customer to explore:

10)  How can Blue Coat scale WAN optimization deployments if their ProxySG product uses a per-peer data store architecture for the Byte Cache?  In an earlier blog, I discussed this important issue that affects both Blue Coat and Cisco WAAS: http://blog.riverbed.com/2009/01/riverbeds-universal-data-store.html

9)  If the write-back setting for CIFS acceleration involves data integrity risks, then why would Blue Coat enable this feature by default?  Page 70 of Volume 2 in the Blue Coat SGOS 5.4 manual warns that data loss can occur if the WAN experiences a disconnect while using Blue Coat’s CIFS write-back feature.  Personally, I would think that risk of data loss is serious-enough of a consequence that this write-back feature should be disabled by default.  Note that unlike Blue Coat, the Riverbed Steelhead does not use a cache architecture, and therefore does not add any new risk of data loss or corruption for CIFS acceleration.  This is certainly proven out by the thousands of Riverbed customers who are actively using the Steelhead solution in its default configuration for CIFS acceleration.

8)  How many Blue Coat customers are using ProxySG for WAN optimization of non-web traffic?  This is a question that Blue Coat has steadfastly refused to answer, as if they didn’t know (and what market leader wouldn’t know what their products are being used for?).  But in a 2 June 2009 teleconference, Blue Coat CEO Brian Nesmith gave a clue by stating, “In [pure] WAN optimization, we win deals based on our ability to accelerate two key application areas — secure web applications and video streaming.”  Associating web applications with WAN optimization is a clever word-play, because it allows Blue Coat to claim leadership in WAN optimization on the basis of legacy web caching features and capabilities that they have offered since the 1990′s.

7)  Why is there so little discussion about WAN optimization on Blue Coat’s community forums?  If Blue Coat is truly the leader in WAN optimization, then I would expect their customers to be actively discussing WAN optimization topics in Blue Coat’s community forums.  This is certainly the case with Riverbed’s community forums (www.wdsforum.org), and you also see some discussion about WAAS and WAN optimization in Cisco’s NetPro forums.  But in the case of Blue Coat’s community forums (http://forums.bluecoat.com/viewforum.php?f=1&sid=e3b8f8d5d2c10d9f75c47d6b0c9503f0), the discussion seems exclusively focused on web security topics such as how to filter You Tube.  There is almost no discussion at all about WAN optimization (or at least how the general market would define WAN optimization).

6)  How does Blue Coat’s dual Object Cache/Byte Cache architecture affect ProxySG’s ability to scale throughput and performance?  Most computer systems bottleneck performance on disk I/O, unless you’re talking about an embedded disk-less system.  After all, disk seek/read/write times are much slower than RAM memory access times, and I would think the same to be true for Blue Coat’s caching systems.  But the difference with Blue Coat compared to Riverbed is that ProxySG must read and write cached data on disk twice–once in the Object Cache, and again in the Byte Cache.  Having to read and write the same data to disk two times should raise throughput/performance scalability concerns.  In contrast, with Riverbed data is only represented once on disk, in the byte-level SDR data store.

5)  Why is Blue Coat’s user manual 3000 pages long?  Does this indicate that the product is difficult to use?  Ease-of-use and simplicity are key elements of a solution that can be deployed and maintained in large networks.  A complex product breeds more complexity and frustration.

4)  Why would Blue Coat as a “security” vendor offer a product lacking disk encryption for persistent disk data?  Any vendor with substantional deployments in WAN optimization would know that customers will be using them in all types of office locations, including small branch offices which may lack adequate security over weekends and evenings.  An intruder can easily steal the disk drives of the ProxySG device, which store in cleartext passwords, security certificates, credit card numbers and any other data that users send over supposedly-secure SSL connections.

3)  When will Blue Coat deliver a one-box solution for WAN optimization/web security/QoS/traffic monitoring?  This was the original promise of Blue Coat’s acquisition of Packeteer, but it appears the long-awaited integrated one-product solution will not happen at all.  In contrast, Riverbed’s RSP provides the framework to deliver WAN optimization, web security, QoS enforcement, and traffic monitoring capabilities, all in a single Steelhead appliance.

2)  Why are PacketShaper revenues declining?  According to SEC documents, historic PacketShaper product revenues (not including support or services revenue) from before their acquisition by Blue Coat exceeded $25M per quarter over several quarters in 2006 and 2007.  But Blue Coat’s most recent PacketShaper quarterly product revenues amounted to only $15M.  It appears PacketShaper is losing significant revenue.

1)  Can Blue Coat scale WAN optimization for non-Web traffic?  As noted in question 8 above, it seems Blue Coat is largely claiming leadership in WAN optimization based on their legacy ability to cache web traffic.  And I have no doubt that Blue Coat can deploy web caches and proxies to 100′s of sites.  But my question is can Blue Coat’s WAN optimization features for CIFS and Exchange be scaled for full deployment in large networks?  There is no evidence to support that they can.  Rather, the evidence indicates that when you exclude web cache deployments, most Blue Coat WAN optimization deployments are quite small–three to nine boxes according to Blue Coat CEO Brian Nesmith in a 25 Aug 2009 teleconference.

Vyatta better than Cisco? Maybe..

 
COMING OUT SWINGING
One month into the new year and there is a lot going on at Vyatta. Already this year we’ve announced new 10Gbps capable appliances (the Vyatta 3500 Series), a global telecom customer win, a partnership with Extreme Networks and an Intel benchmark that achieved 20Gbps routing using Vyatta to test the performance of it’s latest quad-core architecture.

Look out 2010 – we’re coming out swinging and we have no plans to stop. There are a lot of big things happening at Vyatta from products to partners and everything in between – stay tuned.


As always send questions, suggestions, ideas, wants, needs, gripes, etc. to tmccafferty @ vyatta.com.


  VYATTA LAUNCHES 3500 Series APPLIANCES

10Gbps Routing & Security starting at $4595

The Vyatta 3500 Series appliances combine Vyatta open networking software with high-performance hardware to deliver industry-leading price/performance for enterprise and service provider deployments requiring 10-20Gbps routing and security.

>>Integrated Routing & Security
>>up to 8 x 10 GbE ports
>>up to 20 x 1 GbE ports
>>up to 3,000,000 pps throughput
>>up to 8000+ VPN tunnels
>>Redundant hot swap power supplies

For Vyatta 3500 Series Appliance details see
Vyatta 3500 on Vyatta.com >>
Vyatta 3500 Appliance Datasheet >>
Vyatta vs. Cisco Replacement Guide >>


  GLOBAL TELECOM goes VIRTUAL with VYATTA
Last week, Vyatta announced a multi-million dollar, large-scale deployment plan with one of the world’s largest telecom providers.

By deploying tens of thousands of Vyatta virtual machines across the network infrastructure, the telecom is able to provide a new breed of dynamic business services while simultaneously eliminating entire classes of proprietary hardware-based devices. This capability, unique to Vyatta’s software-based approach to networking, has enabled transformational technology and business strategy for the telecom.

“Service providers that are able to leverage advances in virtualization and networking are in a unique position to bring to market the next-generation of premises-based equipment and services for Enterprise branch offices. This technology will simplify the management and deployment of edge devices and services and fundamentally alter the economics of managed service delivery,” said Joe Skorupa, research vice president at Gartner

Press Release >>
Vyatta Blog Post >>


   30 DAY MONEY-BACK GUARANTEE 
You’re the skeptical type huh?  Thousands of installed units at customers around the world isn’t enough to satisfy your concerns?  This is the program for you! 

Purchase Vyatta Software or Hardware Appliances and Vyatta Configuration Services and if you are not satisfied within 30 days, Vyatta will refund the purchase price of your hardware or software.

Click for Program Details  >>


     VYATTA and EXTREME PARTNER
With this partnership, Vyatta and Extreme Networks further their shared mission to deliver higher performance networks and open alternatives to vendor lock-in and proprietary technologies. The combination of Extreme Networks scalable Ethernet solutions for converged enterprise, data centers and carriers with Vyatta’s open network operating system and appliances results in a jointly tested network infrastructure solution that offers organizations a lower total cost of ownership.

Press Release >>


     COMPETITIVE UPGRADE PROGRAM
Competitive Upgrade -  Save 15% with your Cisco Quote

Have you recently considered Cisco but were shocked by the price? Just in case being an average of 50% or more less than the cost of Cisco ISR/ASA/ASR is not enough incentive, we’ll give you an additional discount if you choose Vyatta over Cisco.

For a limited time, send us a copy of your quote for Cisco equipment and we’ll give you an additional 15% discount on Vyatta software subscriptions or hardware appliances.

Click for Program Details  >>


   INTEL TAKES VYATTA to 10Gbps+
Intel recently used Vyatta software to benchmark the power of their latest generation microarchitecture for networking. The public results state, “The revolutionary performance gains from Intel multi-core processors can be applied to data plane, control plane and service application workloads, producing impressive results.” The benchmark demonstrated clearly that “one Intel Xeon processor 5500 series with quad-core technology can readily process 20 Gbps traffic and still have CPU capacity.” It also notes, “Solutions can scale by just adding processor cores and network adapters.”

See Intel Benchmark
Intel Solution Brief – Integrating Services at the Edge
Vyatta + Quad Core Intel Xeon 5500 series forwards traffic at 20 Gbps.

Contact sales@vyatta.com to explore high-performance Vyatta  options for your network.


  ONLINE TRAINING COURSES
Vyatta University now has 17 courses available to help you get your Vyatta system up and running and configured correctly.

See the course catalog for free courses and previews of all paid courses.

Vyatta University Course Catalog >>

Purchase Vyatta University Training >>
 


  VYATTA ADS NOT FIT FOR PRINT
Flexibility in networking, it’s the new requirement. See just how flexible Vyatta is in this months Vyatta Ads Not Fit for Print >>

Send your ad ideas to:  tmccafferty @ vyatta.com – maybe we’ll send you some cool Vyatta SWAG

 
ROI is the big decision point when picking any network gear. If you cannot get an ROI on what you buy then don’t purchase it. If you can save 4k-50k by using Vyatta over old Cisco gear that you are going to replace soon, then that’s a good ROI for any CFO.”

Larry Chaffin
Cisco SubNet

 

 

 

10Gbps Routing + Security for under $5k, and it’s not from Cisco or Juniper
Network World >>

The yin and yang of system specialization
CNet >>

Vyatta Announces New 3500 Series Routers
Network Computing >>

Vyatta 3500 network appliances
ZDNet >>

Open Source: An ‘Advertisement On Steroids’
Information Week >>

MORE NEWS>>

  Linkedin Group

  Facebook Group

   Twitter

Vyatta Powered Logos

Web Referral Program
 
Associates Program
 

 

…a short list of some of the quality community postings related to Vyatta this month.

Roggy – Videos
Vyatta – Example of OpenVPN infront of Microsoft ISA Server

SpiceWorks
Vyatta in Forums

Kernel Hardware
Vyatta Port Forward

N37 Lord
the importance of typing “save”
 

 

 

======================================================================
If you are having problems viewing this e-mail, please copy and paste the following link into the address bar of your web browser: http://www.vyatta.com/newsletter/current.htm
=================================================================

This message was sent to you by:

Vyatta Inc.
1301 Shoreway Road
Suite 200
Belmont, CA  94402

You are receiving this message because you opted-in to receive the Vyatta monthly newsletter when you registered at Vyatta.com. Your e-mail address has not been, and will not be, given to any third parties. We hope that you continue to find our newsletter useful. If you would like to  opt-out of future newsletters from Vyatta Inc. please e-mail dne@vyatta.com

 


  You are subscribed as <larry.chaffin@pluto-networks.net>. Click here to manage your email subscription preferences.
Click here or reply to this email with ‘unsubscribe’ in the subject to unsubscribe from this list or if you feel you have received this message in error.
This message was sent from Vyatta, Inc. 1301 Shoreway Road, Suite 200 Belmont CA 94002-4157 United States FAX: 1-650-591-0119. Click here to report email abuse.

Whatever happened to our WAN Optimization throw down from two years ago?

Whatever happened to our WAN Optimization throw down from two years ago?

Why we will never see a vendor test at Interop.

Do you remember back in April of 2008 when I put a challenge out to Cisco, Blue Coat, Riverbed and Juniper for an old fashion throw down at Interop? Well I have never forgotten and still hopeful that it will happen one day, but then I woke up from a dream. Interop is the best place for a test like this and everyone knows it, the problem is the vendors. Riverbed was the only vendor back then to say they would attend, Cisco would not return a call, nether would Blue Coat or Juniper.

So everyone can go back and read the old post, it is listed here:

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/26779

Now that you have a little back ground, why will we never see a head to head test between vendors? They have too much to lose, if they lost at Interop in a throw down then that’s it for them. So you really have to be sure of your product and the claims it makes. So if we had a thrown down this year, would these vendors attend and put up or shut up? To be honest, I only know of one that would show up and it’s the same one who would attend back in 2008.

So since we cannot get this done I think it is time to do our own test, ask for some equipment and post it up on the blog. So if you have any Cisco, Juniper or Blue Coat WAN Acceleration equipment with the latest release and can loan it to me please email me. It can be small appliances as we are going to test optimization and acceleration, not tcp connections.

I still hope one day we can have these vendors bring their appliances into a room at Interop and set them up on a network in place. I have storage, virtualization, servers and VoIP companies who will donate gear to use in the network.

Please tell us why you think a throw down will never happen.

10Gbps Routing + Security for under $5k, and it’s not from Cisco or Juniper

10Gbps Routing + Security for under $5k, and it’s not from Cisco or Juniper

Vyatta is putting the pressure on large vendors, when will customer give them a chance?

Vyatta has been out for some time and has been doing a good job at providing open source routing and switching to the masses. They have been besting Cisco in the branch/data center space with a better product and price, now they have brought that to the enterprise and service provider space with the release of the 3500 Series Router/Firewall.

In this blog we are going to take a look at a comparison between Cisco and Vyatta on price and technical specifications, then ask why are companies not saving money with Vyatta?

The Vyatta 3500 Series Router and Firewall:

Performance:

            Up to 3,000,000 packets per second (64-byte packets)

            Up to 8,000 simultaneous IPSec VPN tunnels

            VPN forwarding at 900Mbps

           Up to 20Gbps forwarding performance

Primary Features:

            Routing, Firewall, VPN, Intrusion Prevention

            Hot swap redundant power supplies

            4 x 1GbE onboard Ethernet ports

            4x PCI Express slots – 16 additional 1GbE or 8 x 10GbE

Let’s take a look at some comparison between the Vyatta 3500 Series and the Cisco ASR 1006

Vyatta 3510                                                               Cisco 3510 ASR 1006

$4,595                          Base Price                                $75,000

2 RU                             Space Required                        6 RU

$1,500                          Single 10GbE port                     $20,000

$200                             Dual 1GbE port                         $10,000

$6,295                          TOTAL                                   $105,000

Just so people did not think I was picking on the ASR 1006, below we have a few more comparisons

Vyatta 3510 / 3520 Appliance                            Cisco 7200VXR

Price $4,595                                                      Price – $30,000-$36,000

L3 forwarding: 3,000,000 pps                              L3 forwarding: 2,000,000 pps

Throughput: 20Gbps                                          VPN forwarding: 260 Mbps

VPN forwarding: 900 Mbps                                  Max VPN tunnels: 5,000

Max VPN tunnels: 8000

Vyatta 3510 / 3520 Appliance                            Cisco ASA 5550

Price $4,595                                                      Price – $13,500-$60,000

L3 forwarding: 3,000,000 pps                             L3 forwarding: 600,000 pps

Throughput: 20Gbps                                          VPN forwarding: 425 Mbps

VPN forwarding: 900 Mbps                                  Max VPN tunnels:5,000

Max VPN tunnels: 8000

Vyatta 3510 / 3520 Appliance                            Cisco ASR 1000 Series

Price $4,595                                                      Price – $50,000-$180,000

L3 forwarding: 3,000,000 pps                             L3 Forwarding: 4-20,000,00 pps

Throughput: 20Gbps                                          Throughput: 2.5 – 20Gbps

VPN forwarding: 900 Mbps

Max VPN tunnels: 8000

I think the numbers really speak for themselves, but I took it one step beyond that and started to use the product as well as test with a few customers. We used the free version from the Vyatta web site and tested on a small server in the office. Using a VMware workstation with Vyatta loaded on to it, the software worked very well and did not have any problems.

Getting the word out and having that one big win from a large enterprise customer switching from Cisco or Juniper is all Vyatta really needs to prove they belong. Vyatta is joining a good group of open source companies like Asterisk that have moved more into the main stream. But the more interesting part of the Vyatta story is no one has purchased them yet, Cisco and Juniper cannot buy them as then customers would ask for lower prices on routers. A good play that I see would be Riverbed buying Vyatta, if this happened then Riverbed could have its own routing, firewall and vpn appliance running on the RSP Platform. Before you ask; yes it has been testing by me with a customer who wanted to replace all Cisco routers in every branch office. It worked very well in evaluations.

The bottom line is and as I tell all of our customers, ROI is the big decision point when picking any network gear. If you cannot get an ROI on what you buy then don’t purchase it. If you can save 4k-50k by using Vyatta over old Cisco gear that you are going to replace soon, then that’s a good ROI for any CFO. I would like to see an open test between all routing companies at Interop, see who have the best product for the money. But that will never happen as the large companies have too much to lose. 

Next Page »



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.